Critical Times News : Appeal Court approves NASS Election Sequence Bill

Published by / 2 Aug 2018 / No comments / ,

Appeal Court approves NASS Election Sequence Bill


The Court of Appeal Division in Abuja on Wednesday gave its nod to the National Assembly in its bill seeking to re-order the sequence in which the 2019 general elections are to be held by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

The appellate court in a judgment delivered on Wednesday in Abuja in an appeal filled by the National Assembly, nullified the judgment of Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court which last April prohibited the National Assembly from legislating on sequence of election for the electoral umpire.

In the unanimous judgment delivered by President of the Court, Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, the Appeal Court held that the case of the Accord Party which led to the judgment of the High Court was premature at the time it was filed.

The appellate court held that the decision of the High Court in entertaining the suit by the Accord Party amounted to a breach of the doctrine of separation of powers as enshrined in the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Consequently, the appellate court neutralised the veridct of the lower court.

Justice Bulkachuwa said that the suit of the Accord party on the legality of the powers of the National Assembly on election reordering was an academic exercise because the party had no power to have instituted the action in the first instance.

Specifically, the Court of Appeal President said that the Accord Party failed to establish how its rights and obligations were adversely affected by the election reordering bill of the National Assembly.

The appeal court further stated that a bill had no legal effect to expose it to been challenged in court on the basis of the violation of the constitution of the country until it has been passed by the two chambers of the National Assembly and assented to by the appropriate authority.

“The constitution does not envisage that a suit would be filed to challenge a bill at the embryonic stage of legislation because it has no binding effect until it has been assented to”, Justice Bulkachuwa held.

The Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), had written a letter to the appeal court, informing it that the controversial election reordering provision had been deleted by the National Assembly and thus the appeal overtaken by the deletion of the provision. However, the Appeal Court disagreed that the matter was overtaken by event because the appeal case had life in itself.

Justice Bulkachuwa, therefore, upheld the powers of the National Assembly to legislate on election reordering and dismissed the appeal of the Accord Party, AGF and the Independent National Electoral Commission.

It would be recalled that the Accord Party through its lead counsel, Wole Olanipekun (SAN), had dragged the National Assembly before the Federal High Court in Abuja, challenging the legality of the powers of the two chambers of the National Assembly to legislate on election reordering for INEC.

The trial judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed had in his judgment delivered on April 25, prohibited the National Assembly from legislating on election sequence for INEC.

The trial court held that INEC having been established by law had powers to decide on sequence in which elections in the country were to be conducted.

The appeal against the High Court judgment filed by Joseph Daudu (SAN) has therefore led to the upturning of the lower court’s judgment by the Appeal Court.

Share This Post :
Tags : ,
Related Posts

raintemplates-t7

[4][Critical][raintemplates-t7][Critical]

raintemplates-t7

[4][Security][raintemplates-t7][Security]

raintemplates-t7

[4][Education][raintemplates-t7][Education]